The following factors were taken into account in assigning a score from +3 to -5 to the Peer Evaluation Memos:
Positive Factors:
-- specific, detailed feedback for each firm member with useful examples
-- effective use of the Firm's Conduct Rules to organize comments and explicate the award of different points among firm members
-- either (1) award a range of points and explain the basis for differing points for each firm member or (2) if points were evenly divided (or divided 4-4-4-3), provide a persuasive justification for giving each firm member the same points.
Negative Factors:
-- failure to mention or make effective use of the Firm's Conduct Rules
-- very short and general comments
-- dividing points evenly (or 4-4-4-3) without providing a good explanation of why each firm member received the same number of points
-- failure to explain why one firm member received significantly more or less points
-- negative comments that lack sufficient detail to be constructive
Note: the on-line peer evaluation form repeatedly stated: "Explain your point award in terms of your firm's code of conduct. Special examples of the firm member's conduct are encouraged, especially positive examples."